On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> >> Of course! But since I'm writing a book about GIMP, I'm trying to get
> >> as close as possible to what will be finally published. When speaking
> >> about documentation, I was thinking to the NEWS file.
> >
> > If you are writing a book, then you should write it about GIMP 2.6.
> > Everything that is in GIMP 2.7 now may still change at this point, in
> > particular any new features.
> Or plan an appendix to cover possible changes in 2.8, time/deadline
> permitting
> Alexandre
> Since the book is not anticipated to be published before the Autumn of
2010, on the contrary I would very much like that it covers at least version
2.8, or still better, version 3.0. This means I'm not writing or completing
chapters that deal with matters changing a lot presently: one-window or
multi-window interface, brush dynamics, layer groups, color depth, color
management, and so on. Am I forgetting important points subject to changes
until version 3.0?

Since I intend to write a very thorough book (about 800 pages in English,
about 550 in French because the publisher cannot afford more), I have a lot
of work in other areas, and I can wait until things are stabilized. But I
want to follow the progress as much as possible. The American publisher is
No Starch, and the French one is Pearson.

Do you think this approach is sensible?
Olivier Lecarme
Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to