recent discussion on gimp-user brought up some usuability issues
of the JPEG export dialog . Actually, there's nothing new to say
about it... the big "JPEG quality" thread did cover it all .
However, due to the sheer size of that thread, i think a summary of
open issues is useful.
I. Displayed value range for the quality slider
It's surprisingly delicate to choose an innocuous range for that slider:
- 0..100 is an invitation for confusion: 100 = 100% quality = 100%
- using the same range as another application makes it easy to think those
settings were comparable between the applications. (Which they usually are
for various reasons).
Photoshop uses 0.. 12 for "save as JPEG"
0..100 for "save for web"
- starting at 0 feels odd: zero quality = nothing at all = no image?!?
- other don'ts: photoshop allows slider stops between numbers, but doesn't
display the corresponding values 
II. Range of actually useful values for IJG quality value
For GIMP's target users less than half of all possible settings are useful:
or, in ASCII:
. no-go: blocky garbage
. if in dire need
90 the sweet spot
. no-go: just wastes disk space -- ever heard of XCF?
The IJG library takes an integer for the quality value, so there are
only about 15-35 distinct useful settings for the quality slider.
(don't beat me on the exact numbers, i'm willing to provide
suitable image comparisons when/if these numbers become important)
III. Parameter Triaging
The "Subsampling" parameter is more important than its current
position inside the "advanced parameters" section suggests.
Photoshop is the reference here -- it automatically switches
from 2x2 to 1x1 subsampling for the higher quality settings .
Gimp-developer mailing list