On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 05:12:02PM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 08:43:48PM -0400, Zach Beane - MINT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > shortsighted. You never know who might be using something in a way you
> > didn't think of. Err on the side of freedom next time.
> Many sliders in the gimp also have a rather limited range (brush size
> max. 100 points for example).
> Just increasing the range is not sensible however.
> How about logarithmic sliders? These would allow us to increase the
> dynamic range drastically while not loosing accuracy.

The Ink tool could also be larger, think 300 DPI poster stuff :) Though
it might be slow, but someone might have a Quad X3on 600MHz Ph3ar B0x for
gimping or something (no, that is not me :)

20 pixels is pretty small (on 300 dpi that means 1.69 millimeters)



.---( t i g e r t @ g i m p . o r g )---.
| some stuff at http://tigert.gimp.org/ |

Reply via email to