On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 10:17:23PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> Probably not ;) Probably it makes sense because, at one point, all
> drawables might have useful offsets.

Do layer masks have offsets? Obviously you wouldn't be able to set the
offset on the mask, but perhaps it has one anyway (the layer's) ?
In any case, it makes some sense for this to be a method on a drawable,
but the C API could alias it if C developers aren't smart enough to
look in the right place :)


Reply via email to