On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:15:54AM +1000, Roman Joost wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 05:18:26PM -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: > > I think some organization to get it going is indeed necessary - and > > this one - "two weeks for updating translation" is certainly better than > > none. > > > > So, +1 from me. > Sounds good to me as well: +1 > > Basically that means, for each release we create a branch. Every > translator has to "finish" his work on this release branch, until it can > be tagged and the tarballs are created.
Yes. > Another possibility is not to create a branch, but simply use an > announcement mail (which is probably good anyway) to mark the upcoming > release. Yes but in this way you force to stop working on the main document. Instead if you create a branch you freeze for the translator and the work on HEAD could go forward without messing up the translations. This is the concept. -- Marco Ciampa +--------------------+ | Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | +--------------------+ _______________________________________________ gimp-docs-list mailing list email@example.com https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list