On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Crew wrote:
>> you mean compared to a project based image manipulation program, which
>> works on the expectation of combining/editing multiple images and
>> outputting in different image formats?
> So you're saying that thinking of The Gimp as an image editing program is
> wrong then, it need to be primarily regarded as a project based compositing
> program ?
That is what we've been saying for the past 7 years.
> Not sure people coming to it fresh will see it that way.
And there are probably better ways to deal with that.
gimp-user-list mailing list