BABL has been on the drawing board since 2008? 6 years and still not a no go for
a stable Gimp 2.10 release. Changing Gimp license may be faster than waiting
another 3-5 years for a stable BABL so Gimp can use better open source tools..

>I agree with Alexandre. If I really do understand what Jon Nordby is 
>saying (see 
>and if the other babl/GEGL/GIMP developers really are in agreement
>Jon Nordby (the babl roadmap leaves room for differing
>then there is no reason whatsoever for further discussion of forking 
>babl and GEGL to benefit GIMP.

billn (via
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:
List membership:
List archives:

Reply via email to