BABL has been on the drawing board since 2008? 6 years and still not a no go for
a stable Gimp 2.10 release. Changing Gimp license may be faster than waiting
another 3-5 years for a stable BABL so Gimp can use better open source tools..



>I agree with Alexandre. If I really do understand what Jon Nordby is 
>saying (see 
>https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2014-November/msg00018.html
>and 
>https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2014-November/msg00023.html),
>and if the other babl/GEGL/GIMP developers really are in agreement
>with
>Jon Nordby (the babl roadmap leaves room for differing
>interpretations),
>then there is no reason whatsoever for further discussion of forking 
>babl and GEGL to benefit GIMP.

-- 
billn (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
_______________________________________________
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:    gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Reply via email to