BABL has been on the drawing board since 2008? 6 years and still not a no go for a stable Gimp 2.10 release. Changing Gimp license may be faster than waiting another 3-5 years for a stable BABL so Gimp can use better open source tools..
>I agree with Alexandre. If I really do understand what Jon Nordby is >saying (see >https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2014-November/msg00018.html >and >https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2014-November/msg00023.html), >and if the other babl/GEGL/GIMP developers really are in agreement >with >Jon Nordby (the babl roadmap leaves room for differing >interpretations), >then there is no reason whatsoever for further discussion of forking >babl and GEGL to benefit GIMP. -- billn (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list List address: [email protected] List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
