I don't see the difference to be about efficiency. There is noticeable
lag when executing python-fu.
E.g., when I run Akkana Peck's show_py_ui.py plugin, and compare this
with GIMP.org's test-sphere.scm script there is a big difference in
performance up to launcing the UI. I note show_py_ui.py is a smaller
file size, 3kb compared to test-sphere.scm's 6kb (12kb inc comments).
Is it just me on pre-build OSX?
>Date: 22/03/2016 16:34
>Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu
>On 22/03/16 12:27, uga...@talktalk.net wrote:
>> Is there a known performance issue for python-fu compared with
>> I have a pair of comparable scripts, and I find python-fu to be
>> noticeably lagged.
>> I am running 2.8.16 on OSX.
>A script is normally just glue around operations carried out by Gimp,
>the efficiency of the script language is normally fairly irrelevant.
>But different scripts could be using different operations for
>results, one set of operations being more efficient...
>gimp-user-list mailing list
>List address: firstname.lastname@example.org
>List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
>List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address: email@example.com
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list