I don't see the difference to be about efficiency. There is noticeable lag when executing python-fu.
E.g., when I run Akkana Peck's show_py_ui.py plugin, and compare this with GIMP.org's test-sphere.scm script there is a big difference in performance up to launcing the UI. I note show_py_ui.py is a smaller file size, 3kb compared to test-sphere.scm's 6kb (12kb inc comments). Is it just me on pre-build OSX? Thanks. -u >----Original Message---- >From: ofn...@gmx.com >Date: 22/03/2016 16:34 >To: <gimp-user-list@gnome.org> >Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu > >On 22/03/16 12:27, uga...@talktalk.net wrote: >> Is there a known performance issue for python-fu compared with script- >> fu? >> >> I have a pair of comparable scripts, and I find python-fu to be >> noticeably lagged. >> >> I am running 2.8.16 on OSX. >> >> -u >> > >A script is normally just glue around operations carried out by Gimp, so >the efficiency of the script language is normally fairly irrelevant. > >But different scripts could be using different operations for equivalent >results, one set of operations being more efficient... >_______________________________________________ >gimp-user-list mailing list >List address: gimp-user-list@gnome.org >List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list >List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list > _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list List address: gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
