I take the point. Thanks.
>----Original Message---- >From: ke...@ve3syb.ca >Date: 22/03/2016 20:34 >To: <gimp-user-list@gnome.org> >Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu > >On 16-03-22 03:04 PM, uga...@talktalk.net wrote: >> I don't see the difference to be about efficiency. There is noticeable >> lag when executing python-fu. > >Script-Fu is always loaded in memory when GIMP starts. For Python scripts >the Python interpreter must be loaded before it can run the script. The >times it takes to load the Python interepreter would be the lag you are >talking about. > >-- >Cheers! > >Kevin. > >http://www.ve3syb.ca/ |"Nerds make the shiny things that distract >Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 | the mouth-breathers, and that's why we're > | powerful!" >#include <disclaimer/favourite> | --Chris Hardwick >_______________________________________________ >gimp-user-list mailing list >List address: gimp-user-list@gnome.org >List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list >List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list > _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list List address: gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
