>An interesting variable: >- My first download was from the GIMP direct download site. >- My second download of 2.10.0 was from a mirror site. >Who knows? I think cleaning out remnants of 2.8 16 and putting 2.10.0 >in a >new folder did the trick. > >Rick S. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Rick Strong >Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2018 3:00 PM >To: wireless112 ; [email protected] >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.10 very slow > >Not to dismiss your experience, mine is different: > >GIMP 2.10.0 opens in about 7~8 seconds (first opening of the day; >subsequent >openings are faster). >The "Export As" dialogue opens in 4 sec. Ram usage is about 2.07 GB, >26%. >WIN 7 64 Pro, SP 1, 8GB RAM > >My initial install experience with 2.10.0 was bad. It opened *very* >slowly >and then wouldn't open at all. >- I uninstalled 2.10.0. >- I uninstalled 2.8.16 (which supposedly had been uninstalled or >overwritten). >- I installed 2.10 to **a brand new folder.** >- It runs like a charm (so far). > >Might be worth a try. > >Rick S. > >-----Original Message----- >From: wireless112 >Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2018 9:53 PM >To: [email protected] >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.10 very slow > >Slow I think is too generous. I would say 486 about describes the >performance. >Win 10 64. TR 1950x, 32 GB RAM, 2 R7 370's. > >We're talking a minute waiting for export dialogs to finally become >visible, >and >when they do a majority of the time they aren't on the foreground. You >have >to >go hunting. > >I had 2.8 on my previous build, no problems whatsoever. My previous >build >was a >FX8350 with 24GB of RAM. Same video. > >2.8 = Lamborghini Aventador SV > >2.10 = Ford Pinto > >That's with 8 GB more RAM, 8 more cores, and 16 additional threads. >And a >whole >bunch of additional PCIe lanes. Source material on nvm's vs platters. >I >surely >wasn't expecting this slow. I am going to reinstall 2.8 now. > >At this point I am just basically saying me too. Not expecting >assistance on >a >work around, I'll try the next version when it comes out. > >Also 2.10 is a RAM pig.
It is propably windows related issue and maybe hardware related as well. I have tried gimp 2.1 on another pc (it was the first time gimp was installed on that pc) and the performance was terrible. I dont know what to say. All these updates and improvements are worthless if its not stable. And they should remove this release from stable releases. -- labaxp (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list List address: [email protected] List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
