[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2002-04-12 at 1217.06 -0400): > I don't currently have a digital camera. I use the new Kodak format and for
What Kodak format? Are you talking about typical relfex camera with 35mm film or another thing? > the developing process I request digitized photos. I don't now recall the > size of each photo-file return (via CD) but I think each photo-file is a > jpeg file under 1 Meg. And in pixels? That is what really counts... and well, they could give you too something better than JPEG too (aka something lossless). > So my real question is should I buy a $200 HP camera at 1.3 Meg pixels or a > $ 200 HP scanner? If you can afford the development costs (both negative and a mid/small size paper copy), the scanner. Also film has better range. GSR _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
