I hope you don't change GIMP too much. I'm just getting used to the way it works now.
I've never used PS so I don't care how PS does things. David Gowers wrote: > This is certainly true; all of your points are true. > This is being worked on. > However, the specific idea of 'effect layers' is regarded as severely > broken (basically cause it makes nonsense of the whole layers concept: > all layers have content, but oh! effect layers don't. all layers have > blending mode, but oops! effect layers don't. it's user-unfriendly in > this marked inconsistency.) > The implementation I believe we are currently aiming for is instead > oriented around the idea of being able to attach any number of effects > to a given layer group (btw, martin nordholts is doing some great work > on layer trees presently and in the last few months.. they are shaping > up well.) _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
