On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 02:41:03PM -0700, "Jonathan E. Paton"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes... but could be slow. If you run GIMP in batch mode then GIMP loads itself
>again for each
You forget that gimp can be programmed using a variety of languages - the
shell interface (if one could call it thta) is deifnitely not suited for
the task.
> instance. This explains the frequent mention of ImageMagic for batch image
>conversion.
It's more like ease-of-use and less environmental dependencies, not speed.
Gimp is faster at most operations (at very slightly worse quality).
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
