> > Jonny:
> > Assume 3600 seconds per hour, and 1000 images. The
> > average time per image could not exceed 3.6 seconds
> > per hour available.
> If you assume, that gimp run in only one task... it
> can help to reduce time and memory usage. (more than
> one task in one time, but with shared memory. If i'm
> not wrong)
The magical phrase is "average time per image". If you process 5 images concurrently
in 5 minutes
then the average time is 1 minute per image. Multi-tasking doesn't boost the CPU's
which in this case will spend most of its time processing images.
The point I was making regards the rate at which images must be processed, which might
the most suitable software.
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!