Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes, I agree. I'm happy to send you an email when I have committed > changes to gitk if that will help.
Please do not waste your time on that doing it regularly, but do not hesitate to drop me a note if you have something newsworthy. I always fetch from (not necessarily merge with) a couple of repositories before starting my git day, in order to sanity check the status of my private work repository. Your repository is among them, so I'll usually notice. > He did ask me first, and I said he could :). It makes things easier > for me, having gitk in the core git, because it means that I don't > have to worry about making a proper package out of it. I don't see > any reason why gitk would grow to be more than just the script. Understood. So let's keep the current arrangement. > I am also thinking of doing a "gitool", somewhat like bk citool, to > make it easier to create commits. I guess we can decide later whether > to make it part of the core git, although it seems more like porcelain > than gitk. Sounds like it. -jc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
