Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I agree. I'm happy to send you an email when I have committed
> changes to gitk if that will help.
Please do not waste your time on that doing it regularly, but do
not hesitate to drop me a note if you have something newsworthy.
I always fetch from (not necessarily merge with) a couple of
repositories before starting my git day, in order to sanity
check the status of my private work repository. Your repository
is among them, so I'll usually notice.
> He did ask me first, and I said he could :). It makes things easier
> for me, having gitk in the core git, because it means that I don't
> have to worry about making a proper package out of it. I don't see
> any reason why gitk would grow to be more than just the script.
Understood. So let's keep the current arrangement.
> I am also thinking of doing a "gitool", somewhat like bk citool, to
> make it easier to create commits. I guess we can decide later whether
> to make it part of the core git, although it seems more like porcelain
> than gitk.
Sounds like it.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html