On Monday 30 July 2012 14:15:53 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> writes:
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * If the remote helper advertised the "refspec" capability,
> >>> + * it will have the written result of the import to the refs
> > perhaps s/will have the written result of/would have written result of/?
> That would sound like 'If the remote helper advertised the "refspec"
> capability, it would have written the result of the import to the
> refs, but it didn't, so...', so I think "will" is the right tense.
> But 'will have the written' is awkward. How about:
Yes, thats clearly a typing error of mine, 'the' is to be deleted.
> * The fast-import stream of a remote helper advertising the
> * "refspec" capability writes to the refs named after the right
> * hand side of the first refspec matching each ref we were
> * fetching.
> * (If no "refspec" capability is specified, for historical
> * reasons the default is *:*.)
> * Store the result in to_fetch[i].old_sha1. [...]
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html