Eric Wong <> writes:

> Jonathan Nieder <> wrote:
>> Thanks from me as well.  I'm still worried about whether the increased
>> use of canonicalize_url will introduce regressions for the existing
>> SVN 1.6 support, and I should have time to look it over this weekend.
>> The comment in canonicalize_url "There wasn't a 1.6 way to do it" is
>> not true.  The relevant thread on the git list had a little
>> conversation about keeping svn 1.4 support, but I'm not sure why
>> that's relevant, given that svn_canonicalize_path has worked largely
>> the same way starting with SVN 1.1 (and on the other hand had
>> significant changes in SVN 1.7).
>> Hopefully you've looked this over carefully already and I'm worrying
>> needlessly.
> Thanks for reminding me, I went back to an old chroot 1.4.2 indeed
> does fail canonicalization.
> Will bisect and squash a fix in.

Oops; should I eject this out of next and wait for a reroll, then?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to