Angelo Borsotti <angelo.borso...@gmail.com> writes:

> [...] making then the orphan branch point to the master one, i.e.
> becoming a non-orphan one.

I understand both parts of the sentense, but not the "i.e.".

And I still don't see a concrete problem. "two branches point to the
same commit" is not a problem, it's an observation. I have branches
pointing to the same commit all the time.

>> I ended up with a branch "master" and a branch "new-branch", both
>> pointing to the same commit. The new branch _is_ created.
>
> Exactly, it is created, but it is not an orphan ... or more precisely,
> it is sometimes, depending on how fast you are to enter the second
> commit command. This time-dependent behaviour is what I am talking
> about.

You don't understand what an orphan branch is.

What "git checkout --orphan && git commit" does is that it creates a
commit that doesn't have parent (hence the name orphan, btw). It does in
your case. You _do_ create an orphan commit regardless of the timing.

The fact that another branch points to the same commit is a different
matter, and you still didn't explain why this was problematic.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to