On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Eric Wong wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, Stefan Beller wrote:
> > > git send-email/format-patch recently learned to include a base commit
> > You may have noticed that my mail-patch-series.sh-generated code
> > submissions contain that base commit. But they still do not contain the
> > SHA-1s of my local commits corresponding to the patches, and even if they
> > did, the replies with suggested edits would most likely have lost said
> > information.
> > I also hate to break it to you that git-send-email is not going to be part
> > of any solution.
> I think it ought to be. Some reasons I like emailing patches are:
What I said is that *git-send-email* is not going to be part of any
Note that I said *git-send-email*, not "emailing patches".
What many people on this list forget is that few email users *ever* touch
their email configuration. Asking them to figure out their SMTP settings
and then to make git-send-email work is, uhm, quite a bit unrealistic.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html