Jeff King <> writes:

> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 09:17:30PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> ...
>> OK.  Tentatively I replaced your old series with these 8 patches
>> including the last one, as I tend to agree with the value the
>> earlier clean-up in the series gives us in the longer term.  As you
>> and Felipe discussed, we may want to replace the last one with a
>> simpler "don't bother asking" patch, but I think that is more or
>> less an orthogonal issue.
> I'm not sure how orthogonal it is. The latter half of my series is about
> exposing the user_ident_sufficiently_given() flag. If we go with
> Felipe's patch, then that exposed information has no users, and it may
> not be worth it (OTOH, it's possible that some third-party script may
> want it).

Oh, no, you are correct.  I shouldn't have said "the last one", but
instead "the later ones".  The first two we should definitely keep,
at least, but the other three are not so clear.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to