On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 03:29:59PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 05:42:54PM +0100, Heiko Voigt wrote:
> > > Your series does not actually add any callers of the new function. The
> > > obvious "patch 5/4" would be to plumb it into "git config --blob", and
> > > then we can just directly test it there (there could be other callers
> > > besides reading from a blob, of course, but I think the point of the
> > > series is to head in that direction).
> > 
> > Since this is a split of the series mentioned above there are no real
> > callers yet. The main reason for the split was that I wanted to reduce
> > the review burden of one big series into multiple reviews of smaller
> > chunks. If you think it is useful to add the --blob option I can also
> > test from there. It could actually be useful to look at certain
> > .gitmodules options from the submodule script.
> I am on the fence. I do not want to create more work for you, but I do
> think it may come in handy, if only for doing submodule things from
> shell. And it is hopefully not a very large patch. I'd say try it, and
> if starts looking like it will be very ugly, the right thing may be to
> leave it until somebody really wants it.

Thats what I will do: Try it and see where I get.

Cheers Heiko
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to