Josh Triplett <> writes:

> OK, I take it back.  I *can* imagine configurations that this change
> would break, since it does change intentional and documented behavior,
> but I don't have any such configuration.  The only such configuration I
> can imagine involves directly counting on the non-rewriting of pushUrl,
> by using pushInsteadOf to rewrite urls and then sometimes using pushUrl
> to override that and point back at the un-rewritten URL.  And while
> supported, that does seem *odd*.
> Objection withdrawn; if nobody can come up with a sensible configuration
> that relies on the documented behavior, I don't particularly care if it
> changes.

I actually do.

Given the popularity of the system, "people involved in this thread
cannot imagine a case that existing people may get hurt" is very
different from "this is not a regression".  After merging this
change when people start complaining, you and Rob can hide and
ignore them, but we collectively as the Git project have to have a
way to help them when it happens.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to