SZEDER Gábor <sze...@ira.uka.de> writes:
>> Now I do not recall suggesting it, and you (and I today after 2
>> years) may disagree with the rationale, but at least we can read
>> what was the "intended" meaning, I think.
> I still agree with the rationale,...
Thanks for a pointer. I think what I was suggesting was slightly
different in that I was hoping to see a single helper that knows to
complete to object names (possibly including trees/blobs with the
treeish:path notation), ranges, and pathnames (not treeish:path
notation) until it sees a "--" and then complete only to pathnames.
It can be improved by teaching the unified one that some command
like "log" can never take treeish:path but only committishes, some
command take individual object names but never ranges, and/or
details like that. But I still agree that "git log HEAD:dir<TAB>"
that completes to a blob or a tree object name is not an issue
(because what was before <TAB> cannot possibly name anything "git
log" would appreciate), even though it might not be ideal.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html