On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote:
>> Go back to my 261 commits, show me one that is "unmindful of technical 
>> details".
> And you say this thread is an excellent example of your point that I'm
> unmindful of technical details?
> It's not. There are no technical details I was unmindful of in this thread.

Ok, I'll bite (against my better judgment). From a related thread, a
few minutes ago:

On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Thomas Rast <tr...@inf.ethz.ch> wrote:
>> So you would deliberately break a bisection on this test file?
> No, this patch series won't be applied.

Thomas points out a technical detail with the patch series, and the
answer given is 100% non-constructive.

FWIW, I'd like to express my support for the opinions expressed by
Jonathan, Jeff and Thomas. They accurately describe my impression of
these discussion threads.


Johan Herland, <jo...@herland.net>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to