On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote: >> Go back to my 261 commits, show me one that is "unmindful of technical >> details". > > And you say this thread is an excellent example of your point that I'm > unmindful of technical details? > > It's not. There are no technical details I was unmindful of in this thread.
Ok, I'll bite (against my better judgment). From a related thread, a few minutes ago: On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Thomas Rast <tr...@inf.ethz.ch> wrote: >> So you would deliberately break a bisection on this test file? > No, this patch series won't be applied. Thomas points out a technical detail with the patch series, and the answer given is 100% non-constructive. FWIW, I'd like to express my support for the opinions expressed by Jonathan, Jeff and Thomas. They accurately describe my impression of these discussion threads. ...Johan -- Johan Herland, <jo...@herland.net> www.herland.net -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
