On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Johan Herland <jo...@herland.net> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote:
>>> Go back to my 261 commits, show me one that is "unmindful of technical 
>>> details".
>> And you say this thread is an excellent example of your point that I'm
>> unmindful of technical details?
>> It's not. There are no technical details I was unmindful of in this thread.
> Ok, I'll bite (against my better judgment). From a related thread, a
> few minutes ago:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Thomas Rast <tr...@inf.ethz.ch> wrote:
>>> So you would deliberately break a bisection on this test file?
>> No, this patch series won't be applied.
> Thomas points out a technical detail with the patch series, and the
> answer given is 100% non-constructive.



There. Are you happy?

I dropped the patches that are not part of the series.

Who benefits from this? NOBODY. Certainly not the users.

Felipe Contreras
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to