Le 2013-06-24 18:56, Matthieu Moy a écrit :
Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:

Matthieu Moy <matthieu....@grenoble-inp.fr> writes:

benoit.per...@ensimag.fr writes:

diff --git a/contrib/mw-to-git/git-mw.perl b/contrib/mw-to-git/git-mw.perl
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a2f0aa1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/contrib/mw-to-git/git-mw.perl

*.perl scripts are usually executable in Git's tree (although it's
usually better to run the non-*.perl version).

Good eyes.  But if we encourage people to run non-*.perl version,
perhaps we should drop the executable bit from the source, no?

But by default, I'd say consistency is most important so if other *.perl are executable, we should do the same (otherwise my "ls" shows different
colors and it's ugly ;-) ).
So it's really a *nice* catch then :) .

But it may make sense to change the convention, i.e. run a "chmod -x
*.perl" in Git's tree (in any case, people can still run "perl
For what I've seen so far of git.git, the best way would be to make it
executable in this patch serie and send another patch applying that
'chmod -x'-thingy ?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to