John Szakmeister wrote:
> I guess it's not a good idea to
> set 'push.default' to 'upstream' in this triangle workflow then,
> otherwise the branch name being pushed to will be 'branch.*.merge'.
> Is that correct?  I just want to make sure I understand what's
> happening here.

push.default = upstream does not support triangular workflows. See

> Given this new found knowledge, I'm not sure it makes sense for `git
> status` to show me the status against the upstream vs. the publish
> location.  The latter makes a little more sense to me, though I see
> the usefulness of either one.

Currently, status information is only against @{u}; we haven't
invented a @{publish} yet.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to