Johan Herland <jo...@herland.net> writes: > Obviously, the feature would necessarily have to be optional, simply > because Git would have to keep understanding the old commit object > format for a LONG time (probably indefinitely), and there's nothing > you can do to prevent others from creating old-style commit objects.
Personally, I am _strongly_ opposed. How I name and juggle my private branches is nobody else's business in a distributed version control system. They are private. My personal workflow. Not part of a commit. -- David Kastrup -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
