Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:

> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:
>> > Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:
>> >
>> >> We could. Personally I don't see the point of making the warning any
>> >> more annoying....
>> If we were giving the users a choice of "no thanks, I'll keep using
>> the obsolete one", then trying to be a low key and giving them a way
>> to squelch with an advice.* config might make sense, but if we plan
>> to remove/stub at as early as v2.1, I think annoyance is very much
>> what we want, actually, because it clearly is the case that we do
>> prefer users switching instead of waiting for v2.1.
>> How does this sound?
> The patch below assumes the user has ~/bin in his PATH, which might not
> be the case. Personally I don't see the point of creating extra
> annoyance with instructions that might not work.

Yeah, I would be lying if I said that "that might not work" did not
bother me, but I decided it would be on the good side of the
borderline (it is better to be concise and slightly wrong than
ultra-verbose and precise).  As you may have guessed, they were
stolen from your earlier message that shows what the site says after
all ;-)

I will probably tag -rc4 with the patch applied sometime tomorrow.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to