tustvold opened a new pull request, #4522:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/4522

   # Which issue does this PR close?
   
   <!--
   We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and 
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases. You can 
link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example `Closes #123` 
indicates that this PR will close issue #123.
   -->
   
   Closes #.
   
   # Rationale for this change
   
   <!--
    Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly in 
the issue then this section is not needed.
    Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand your 
changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.  
   -->
   
   The existing memory manager interface is quite tricky to use, and has 
resulted in the proliferation of "utility" wrappers to make it easier to work 
with. It also mixes the concept of limiting memory, with "memory scheduling" 
where it tries to distribute memory "fairly". In practice I'm not sure this 
would have worked, and would likely have blocked tokio worker threads #4325.
   
   This PR proposes a drastic simplification of MemoryManager
   
   # What changes are included in this PR?
   <!--
   There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it is 
sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this PR.
   -->
   
   There are a couple of major changes worth highlighting:
   
   * MemoryManager will no longer block waiting for capacity
   * MemoryManager no longer attempts to guarantee any form of "fairness", 
memory policy can be handled at a higher level by creating separate memory 
pools for queries to execute from
   * ExternalSorter will refuse to sort batches that are larger than it can 
allocate from the memory pool
   
   # Are these changes tested?
   
   <!--
   We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
   1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
   2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code
   
   If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example, are 
they covered by existing tests)?
   -->
   
   # Are there any user-facing changes?
   
   <!--
   If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be 
updated before approving the PR.
   -->
   
   <!--
   If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api 
change` label.
   -->


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to