alamb commented on PR #6873: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/6873#issuecomment-2543108939
> How would I write an IPC dictionary with an ID of 32 without using Field::dict_id? As written the deprecation notice basically reads, "we've removed this functionality, if you need it 🤷♂️", I think we need to actually provide a viable alternative. This doesn't need to be using Field::dict_id, and could be some setup using DictionaryTracker, but we do need to document whatever it is. Otherwise people lack a clear migration path. I can help with this -- is there some test / example of what assigning dict_ids in the IPC means (aka some example of the use that I can use an example to craft the API?) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
