zeroshade commented on code in PR #2825:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/2825#discussion_r2114117285


##########
go/adbc/utils/utils.go:
##########
@@ -73,3 +81,50 @@ func removeFieldMetadata(field *arrow.Field) arrow.Field {
                Metadata: arrow.Metadata{},
        }
 }
+
+func SetErrorOnSpan(span trace.Span, err error) bool {
+       if err != nil {
+               span.RecordError(err)
+               if adbcError, ok := err.(adbc.Error); ok {
+                       
span.SetAttributes(attribute.String(TraceAttributeErrorType, 
adbcError.Code.String()))
+               }
+               span.SetStatus(codes.Error, err.Error())
+               return true
+       }
+       return false
+}
+
+func TraceSpan(
+       ctx context.Context,
+       tracing adbc.OTelTracing,
+       spanName string,
+       execFunc func(ctx context.Context, span trace.Span) error,
+       opts ...trace.SpanStartOption,
+) error {

Review Comment:
   I don't entirely understand why we need this function to take the `execFunc` 
like this and use the `defer func()` in this way instead of just having a 
utility function that returns the span and let the calling function add a 
`defer span.End()` call to it. I honestly dislike the idea of having to 
essentially encase *every* function within a level of indirection like this, 
which will also prevent inlining and other optimizations. 
   
   Methods should simply have:
   
   ```go
   func (...) SomeMethod(ctx context.Context, ....) {
       ctx, span := startSpan(ctx, spanName, opts....)
       defer span.End()
   
       ....
   }
   ```
   
   We shouldn't need to wrap things the way that this does.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to