TheNeuralBit commented on a change in pull request #16541:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/16541#discussion_r792243106



##########
File path: sdks/python/apache_beam/utils/processes_test.py
##########
@@ -48,11 +48,9 @@ def test_method_forwarding_not_windows(self, *unused_mocks):
     processes.subprocess.check_call.assert_called_once_with(
         ['subprocess', 'check_call'], shell=False, other_arg=True)
 
-    processes.check_output(['subprocess', 'check_output'],
-                           shell=False,
-                           other_arg=True)

Review comment:
       Does this actually trigger the pylint warning? The function accepts 
arbitrary keyword args: 
https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/640e6c245a89581578da68b26d6e27b55deb6a80/sdks/python/apache_beam/utils/processes.py#L85
   
   Regardless I think `other_arg` is part of what this test is verifying, so I 
don't think we should remove it. Let's disable the check instead if necessary.
   

##########
File path: sdks/python/apache_beam/transforms/cy_combiners.py
##########
@@ -83,13 +83,14 @@ def extract_output(self):
 
 
 class SumInt64Accumulator(object):
+  INT64_MAX = 2**_63-1
+  INT64_MIN = -2**_63
   def __init__(self):
     self.value = 0
 
   def add_input(self, element):
-    global INT64_MAX, INT64_MIN  # pylint: disable=global-variable-not-assigned

Review comment:
       I think it would be preferable to just disable the `undefined-variable` 
as well.

##########
File path: sdks/python/apache_beam/dataframe/frame_base_test.py
##########
@@ -65,9 +65,9 @@ def add_one(frame):
     x = frames.DeferredSeries(original_expr)
     x.add_one()
     self.assertIs(x._expr, original_expr)
-    x.add_one(inplace=False)
+    x.add_one(frame=False)
     self.assertIs(x._expr, original_expr)
-    x.add_one(inplace=True)

Review comment:
       This breaks the test: 
https://ci-beam.apache.org/job/beam_PreCommit_Python_Commit/21214/testReport/junit/apache_beam.dataframe.frame_base_test/FrameBaseTest/test_maybe_inplace/
   
   Should we just disable the check here instead?

##########
File path: sdks/python/apache_beam/coders/coders.py
##########
@@ -802,7 +802,7 @@ def _create_impl(self):
         lambda x: dumps(x, protocol), pickle.loads)
 
   def as_deterministic_coder(self, step_label, error_message=None):
-    return FastPrimitivesCoder(self, requires_deterministic=step_label)

Review comment:
       Hm this does look like a problem, but I don't think this is the 
appropriate fix. Maybe we should be creating a 
`DeterministicFastPrimitivesCoder` instead. Do you know @robertwb?




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to