jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #12308:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/12308#discussion_r1776633248


##########
datafusion/expr/src/expr_schema.rs:
##########
@@ -150,21 +150,22 @@ impl ExprSchemable for Expr {
                     .collect::<Result<Vec<_>>>()?;
 
                 // verify that function is invoked with correct number and 
type of arguments as defined in `TypeSignature`
-                data_types_with_scalar_udf(&arg_data_types, 
func).map_err(|err| {
-                    plan_datafusion_err!(
-                        "{} {}",
-                        err,
-                        utils::generate_signature_error_msg(
-                            func.name(),
-                            func.signature().clone(),
-                            &arg_data_types,
+                let new_data_types = 
data_types_with_scalar_udf(&arg_data_types, func)

Review Comment:
   I think this is the root cause of the issue and to solve this other changes 
are necessary. Therefore, I think we should go with this change and maybe 
further optimize the coercion in another PR.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to