mesejo commented on code in PR #12308:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/12308#discussion_r1776672713
##########
datafusion/expr/src/expr_schema.rs:
##########
@@ -150,21 +150,22 @@ impl ExprSchemable for Expr {
.collect::<Result<Vec<_>>>()?;
// verify that function is invoked with correct number and
type of arguments as defined in `TypeSignature`
- data_types_with_scalar_udf(&arg_data_types,
func).map_err(|err| {
- plan_datafusion_err!(
- "{} {}",
- err,
- utils::generate_signature_error_msg(
- func.name(),
- func.signature().clone(),
- &arg_data_types,
+ let new_data_types =
data_types_with_scalar_udf(&arg_data_types, func)
Review Comment:
Ok, so should I leave it as it is? Or change it back to how it was:
```rust
data_types_with_scalar_udf(&arg_data_types, func)
```
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
