PokIsemaine commented on code in PR #1724:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1724#discussion_r1962883847
##########
src/parser/mod.rs:
##########
@@ -9191,17 +9191,31 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
pub fn parse_optional_order_by(&mut self) -> Result<Option<OrderBy>,
ParserError> {
if self.parse_keywords(&[Keyword::ORDER, Keyword::BY]) {
- let order_by_exprs =
self.parse_comma_separated(Parser::parse_order_by_expr)?;
- let interpolate = if dialect_of!(self is ClickHouseDialect |
GenericDialect) {
- self.parse_interpolations()?
+ let order_by = if self.parse_keyword(Keyword::ALL) {
+ if !self.dialect.supports_order_by_all() {
+ return parser_err!(
+ "ALL is not supported in ORDER BY",
+ self.peek_token().span.start
+ );
+ }
Review Comment:
If dialect supports `ORDER BY ALL`, what kind of behavior do you think is
appropriate? Should it be like before, parser_err, or parsed as a special
OrderBy?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
