alamb commented on PR #14837: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14837#issuecomment-2872678278
> Can we extend this sort of an approach to UDAFs? Having two entirely separate mechanisms would not be great. The data for an `async` user defined aggregate function must come from somewhere (presumably locally) and so aggregating using a remote service could be dicey Maybe the usecaes is "send many rows of data to a remote LLM service" for example, ```sql select user_id, call_llm_to_summarize(tweet_content) FROM tweets ``` In this case, a lot of the user defined aggregate function API (like intermediate state, and GroupsAccumulators) doesn't make much sense. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
