jonathanc-n commented on code in PR #16660: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16660#discussion_r2274717502
########## datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/piecewise_merge_join.rs: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,2071 @@ +// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one +// or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file +// distributed with this work for additional information +// regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file +// to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the +// "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance +// with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at +// +// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 +// +// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, +// software distributed under the License is distributed on an +// "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY +// KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the +// specific language governing permissions and limitations +// under the License. + +use arrow::array::{new_null_array, Array, RecordBatchOptions}; +use arrow::compute::take; +use arrow::{ + array::{ + ArrayRef, BooleanBufferBuilder, RecordBatch, UInt32Array, UInt32Builder, + UInt64Array, UInt64Builder, + }, + compute::{concat_batches, sort_to_indices, take_record_batch}, + util::bit_util, +}; +use arrow_schema::{ArrowError, Schema, SchemaRef, SortOptions}; +use datafusion_common::NullEquality; +use datafusion_common::{ + exec_err, internal_err, plan_err, utils::compare_rows, JoinSide, Result, ScalarValue, +}; +use datafusion_execution::{ + memory_pool::{MemoryConsumer, MemoryReservation}, + RecordBatchStream, SendableRecordBatchStream, +}; +use datafusion_expr::{JoinType, Operator}; +use datafusion_functions_aggregate_common::min_max::{max_batch, min_batch}; +use datafusion_physical_expr::equivalence::join_equivalence_properties; +use datafusion_physical_expr::{ + LexOrdering, OrderingRequirements, PhysicalExpr, PhysicalExprRef, PhysicalSortExpr, +}; +use datafusion_physical_expr_common::physical_expr::fmt_sql; +use futures::{Stream, StreamExt, TryStreamExt}; +use parking_lot::Mutex; +use std::fmt::Formatter; +use std::{cmp::Ordering, task::ready}; +use std::{sync::Arc, task::Poll}; + +use crate::execution_plan::{boundedness_from_children, EmissionType}; + +use crate::joins::sort_merge_join::compare_join_arrays; +use crate::joins::utils::{ + get_final_indices_from_shared_bitmap, symmetric_join_output_partitioning, +}; +use crate::{handle_state, DisplayAs, DisplayFormatType, ExecutionPlanProperties}; +use crate::{ + joins::{ + utils::{ + build_join_schema, BuildProbeJoinMetrics, OnceAsync, OnceFut, + StatefulStreamResult, + }, + SharedBitmapBuilder, + }, + metrics::ExecutionPlanMetricsSet, + spill::get_record_batch_memory_size, + ExecutionPlan, PlanProperties, +}; + +/// `PiecewiseMergeJoinExec` is a join execution plan that only evaluates single range filter. +/// +/// The physical planner will choose to evalute this join when there is only one range predicate. This +/// is a binary expression which contains [`Operator::Lt`], [`Operator::LtEq`], [`Operator::Gt`], and +/// [`Operator::GtEq`].: +/// Examples: +/// - `col0` < `colb`, `col0` <= `colb`, `col0` > `colb`, `col0` >= `colb` +/// +/// Since the join only support range predicates, equijoins are not supported in `PiecewiseMergeJoinExec`, +/// however you can first evaluate another join and run `PiecewiseMergeJoinExec` if left with one range +/// predicate. +/// +/// # Execution Plan Inputs +/// For `PiecewiseMergeJoin` we label all left inputs as the `streamed' side and the right outputs as the +/// 'buffered' side. +/// +/// `PiecewiseMergeJoin` takes a sorted input for the side to be buffered and is able to sort streamed record +/// batches during processing. Sorted input must specifically be ascending/descending based on the operator. +/// +/// # Algorithms +/// Classic joins are processed differently compared to existence joins. +/// +/// ## Classic Joins (Inner, Full, Left, Right) +/// For classic joins we buffer the right side (buffered), and incrementally process the left side (streamed). Review Comment: @2010YOUY01 and I were discussing to change this to be the opposite as it is the norm for datafusion. mix up on my part. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
