Yes, that's what I think as well. The internationalization bit would be important for private servers though, and in that case it is enough to have it set up globally.
On Jan 9, 10:11 pm, "Johan Sørensen" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:32 PM, AkitaOnRails <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I've just finished my marathon to internationalize Gitorious. Take a > > look > > athttp://gitorious.org/projects/gitorious/repos/mainline/merge_requests... > > > This is a major change as I had to touch almost every single file in > > the project in order to properly extract all strings into the locales/ > > en.rb file. I also did the Brazilian Portuguese translation at the > > same time. > > Wow, that' must've been an incredible repetitive task! ;) nicely done. > > > Feedback is needed. Please try to make it work on your environments > > and see if everything is working properly. And for people from other > > countries: time to start contributing with new translations! > > Seems ok for the english translation after a quick runthrough locally. > > I'm not sure gitorious.org should be multi-lingual, since there's a > certain value in having things such as project descriptions in english > for the community at large, and having the rest of the UI in english > would inspire to keep it that way. So, there may not be much point in > sweating too much over not having dynamic locale switching yet. > > JS --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Gitorious" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gitorious?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
