Jean-Fred, That is an interesting example. In Wikidata terms this is of course a composite object. I would then describe it in two items, the parchment and the seal, where the seal is part of the parchment. I can understand that on Commons you might feel it's overkill to have two images, but for someone doing a quick comparison of seals it may be nice to make a derivative image and rotate the image to straighten it out. Maybe there already is one, in which case the Wikidata "has part" property would be associated with the commons "gallery of one" inclusion under the "other versions" field. Jane
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Jean-Frédéric <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi Lizzy, > > Thank you for your work ! > > Formatting it like >> >> {{size|cm|height=379.5}} {{size|cm|width=453.5}} {{weight|kg|337}} >> >> seems like the most logical course, if you're not sure all the units >> >> for height/width will be the same. >> >> >> Thats a great solution! Thanks! >> > > Tangentially to that: for a while now I was playing with the idea of > adding an extra parameter to {{size}}. > For media like < > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Confirmation_du_roi_Louis_VI_le_Gros_1_-_Archives_Nationales_-_AE-II-132.jpg>, > I had dimensions for the piece of parchment and the seal. I was thinking of > something like {{Size|unit=cm|diameter=9|part=seal}}. Would that be useful > in your opinions ? > > -- > Jean-Fred > > _______________________________________________ > Glamtools mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools > >
_______________________________________________ Glamtools mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
