Hi Jean-Fred, That is a very good solution! It is very precise because it also tells you what you were measuring and easy to implement too. I would be all for your solution! (And let me share our measurement nightmare: https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/nl/search/objecten?q=BK-1995-3&p=1&ps=12&ii=0#/BK-1995-3,0 an 18th century mantelpiece. I am not going to upload this item now, but a solution like yours would create some sort of order in this chaos).
Best wishes lizzy Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Namens Jean-Frédéric Verzonden: vrijdag 11 september 2015 12:50 Aan: Conversations revolving around the development of GLAM Digital Tools <[email protected]> Onderwerp: Re: [Glamtools] New at this and trying to configure our API Hi Lizzy, Thank you for your work ! Formatting it like {{size|cm|height=379.5}} {{size|cm|width=453.5}} {{weight|kg|337}} seems like the most logical course, if you're not sure all the units for height/width will be the same. Thats a great solution! Thanks! Tangentially to that: for a while now I was playing with the idea of adding an extra parameter to {{size}}. For media like <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Confirmation_du_roi_Louis_VI_le_Gros_1_-_Archives_Nationales_-_AE-II-132.jpg>, I had dimensions for the piece of parchment and the seal. I was thinking of something like {{Size|unit=cm|diameter=9|part=seal}}. Would that be useful in your opinions ? -- Jean-Fred
_______________________________________________ Glamtools mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
