> The SRES A series scenarios are generally the bad, or business as > usual, ones, with A2 probably being the most studied of the group. The > B series would be the predictions for various attempts at making cuts > in emissions [other than greenhouse gases.]
I thought all SRES scenarios explicitly excluded any attempts at reducing emissions of greenhouse gases. The stabilisation scenarios can be found here: http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg3/fig2-13.htm http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg3/082.htm For a detailed consideration of costs I found the following paper most helpful (referenced in that section of the IPCC report): Mori, S. 2000: Effects of Carbon Emission Mitigation Options under Carbon Concentration Stabilization Scenarios. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 3(2). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change. Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
