> > This is a weird thing to say. The 2001 report had Ant and Gr just about
> > cancelling out. That wasn't at all implausible, it was what the science
> > says.
> > Fairly recently has come some evidence for more melt. Is (10) a ref to
> > 2001 or
> > 2007?
>
> It's 2001.
-Then Hansens comment is very odd.
-
-W.
Not unless you assume that calling it "implausible" means "implausible at
the time". He may just mean that in light of the new findings since 2000,
the 2001 IPCC conclusion about sea level is now implausible.
Coby
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
