> Not unless you assume that calling it "implausible" means "implausible at
> the time". He may just mean that in light of the new findings since 2000,
> the 2001 IPCC conclusion about sea level is now implausible.
You'd have to ask him what he exactly means, but I don't read it that
way. I think he fundamentally disagrees with the IPCC consensus on ice
sheet dynamics, though he readily condedes that that isn't his core
area of expertise.
While I've only read the draft of the latest IPCC report (as have you),
I don't think there'll be a material change in the IPCC estimates for
sea level change in the 2007 version.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
