> Not unless you assume that calling it "implausible" means "implausible at > the time". He may just mean that in light of the new findings since 2000, > the 2001 IPCC conclusion about sea level is now implausible. > > Coby
Dang. As James A. reminded me elsewhere recently to good effect, some words http://julesandjames.blogspot.com/2006/09/can-we-believe-in-high-climate.html#115948489469999042 are defined in the IPCC docs as range-of-percentage probabilities. But 'implausible' isn't one of them. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change. Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
