Michael Tobis wrote:
> I think this may be an unfair criticism. I get 633 results on "climate
> change" form whitehouse.gov .
>
> I argue here:
> http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=92
> that "global warming" is a very poor name for what we are talking about. I
> am pleased that, whatever else they may or may not be doing, the White House
> is at least avoiding this confusing nomenclature.
The White House doubtless has reasons for avoiding the term "global
warming", but a concern for the integrity of scientific terminology is
probably not one of them.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
