> Can I just chip in with the observation that CO2 removal might be
> accomplished rather more economically by using biological plants than
> nuclear ones?
It's certainly an option for capturing carbon humanity has been
familiar with for a rather long time, and it's also where I make my
money. My area of research is fast pyrolysis of biomass.
I think carbon capture is extremely well established and proven
technology when considering the biological routes.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
