----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: gmane.science.general.global-change
To: "globalchange" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 2:16 PM
Subject: [Global Change: 1316] Re: new IPCC assessment


>
>> Can I just chip in with the observation that CO2 removal might be
>> accomplished rather more economically by using biological plants than
>> nuclear ones?
>
> It's certainly an option for capturing carbon humanity has been
> familiar with for a rather long time, and it's also where I make my
> money. My area of research is fast pyrolysis of biomass.
>
> I think carbon capture is extremely well established and proven
> technology when considering the biological routes.
>

I question that the scheme described by Gareth would be more economical. 
Every step involves spending with no direct economic return on investment. 
Engineering a new plant (spend), planting the plants (spend), harvesting the 
plants (spend), and dumping them in the ocean (spend).

Contrast that with the nuclear economy: build a plant (spend), sell 
electricity (income).  In a profit-motivated economy, the nuclear option 
would seem rather more "economical" to me.

Of course, if the new carbon sequestering supertrees were converted to fuel 
for combustion rather than ocean dumping, there would be a potentialy 
profitable enterprise, but of course, this would amount simply to co2 
emission avoidance with no net reduction.

So, the nuclear carbon sequestration machine does appear to be the more 
economical way to remove co2 from the atmosphere.

-dl 



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to