[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am not sure what Branson's prize is about exactly. Presumably it
> would be for technology that could do the CO2 removal at very low
> energy and overall cost? What I've read about it sounds awfully vague.
I see RC found this:
http://www.virginearth.com/
wherein there are some more (but still rather vague) details. It looks
like rather trying to eliminate all loopholes via detailed
specifications, they are leaving it all to the discretion of the judges,
which is probably reasonable enough.
It's clearly looking for free air capture, rather than using smokestacks
as a starting point. As Eli has pointed out, that isn't necessarily the
best choice, but OTOH it has the advantage of being location-free.
I'll not say more for fear of giving away my idea :-)
James
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
