> So, the nuclear carbon sequestration machine does appear to be the more
> economical way to remove co2 from the atmosphere.

The beauty of the biological route is that CO2 removal from the air is
a necessary step for all biomass formation. That does not apply to
nuclear power, you'd always have to divert some of the power output
from nuclear to achieve CO2 capture.

In practical terms, think of paper making and well managed landfills
for example. There we've got a current example of a case where the
biomass is not burned, and it's economic.

Or, consider the production of ethanol

C6H12O6 (sugar) goes to 2 CO2 + 2 C2H6O (ethanol)

About half of the mass of the sugar is turned into a pure CO2 stream,
which is ready for sequestration (and that sequestration step could of
course be powered by cheap, clean and renewable* nuclear power).

While some CO2 from ethanol production is currently used by fizzy
drinks makers, that's rather short duration sequestration, I don't
think any is currently being injected underground. Enhanced oil
recovery schemes get their CO2 from other sources I believe.

* even President Bush has called nuclear power "renewable"; there is
no commonly agreed definition of renewable, but, using breeders and
uranium from sea water it is possible to go on using nuclear power for
billions of years, which is renewable enough for me.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to